<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Communism%2C_Inc.%2Fnon-profit</id>
	<title>Communism, Inc./non-profit - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Communism%2C_Inc.%2Fnon-profit"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=Communism,_Inc./non-profit&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-13T23:14:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=Communism,_Inc./non-profit&amp;diff=3495&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Woozle: Created page with &quot;Non-profits have a somewhat unearned reputation as being fundamentally benevolent entities.  Many non-profits are non-profit in name only, paying their executives exorbitant s...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=Communism,_Inc./non-profit&amp;diff=3495&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-09-22T22:36:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Non-profits have a somewhat unearned reputation as being fundamentally benevolent entities.  Many non-profits are non-profit in name only, paying their executives exorbitant s...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Non-profits have a somewhat unearned reputation as being fundamentally benevolent entities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many non-profits are non-profit in name only, paying their executives exorbitant salaries. Boards of directors are often composed of executives at other non-profits, and vice-versa -- an interlocking grid of mutual back-scratching -- which both serves to maintain those absurd salaries and also to facilitate collaboration, among the executive caste, towards steering non-profits away from any activities that might create genuine social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, non-profits are generally dependent on sponsors, the largest of whom inevitably have an anti-change agenda. (There's an article about this by 9/11 whistleblower Sibel Edmonds; I'm still trying to locate it.)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Woozle</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>