Exhibits/debate/how it works - Revision history

Woozle: /* Later Enhancements */ link update

2018-06-04T23:26:12Z

Later Enhancements: link update

2015-10-02T13:18:32Z

Woozle moved page Exhibits/debate/summary to Exhibits/debate/how it works without leaving a redirect: "summary" could mean a summary of the debates, OSLT

2015-10-02T13:13:15Z

first pass

2015-10-01T21:27:01Z

to be written

New page

==Software Rules==
There is a more technical explanation on HTYP: {{l/htyp|InstaGov/Debate Mapper}}

(writing in progress)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 There needs to be a way to make a point dependent on a point that already has another parent, or that is a root point.
 ==Later Enhancements==
-In practical use, there will need to be a method to prevent trolling, gaming the rules, etc. {{l/igov|Credibility management}} seems like a promising solution.
+In practical use, there will need to be a method to prevent trolling, gaming the rules, etc. {{l/igov|Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement}} seems like a promising solution.
 Other options:
 * allow users to vote on the "leaf" points (agree/disagree), making it possible to map out different belief-systems.
 * allow users to vote on non-leaf points, making it possible to see where people are unwilling to accept the existing evidence.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:18, 2 October 2015
(No difference)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Software Rules==
-There is a more technical explanation on HTYP: {{l/htyp|InstaGov/Debate Mapper}}
+There is a slightly more technical explanation on HTYP: {{l/htyp|InstaGov/Debate Mapper}}
-(writing in progress)
+* Each comment in the debate ("debate point" or just "point" for short) is either a root claim or a response.