Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/202432 - Revision history

Woozle: rephrase (unexpectedly difficult point to make succinctly)

2015-10-05T00:31:16Z

rephrase (unexpectedly difficult point to make succinctly)

Woozle: link to wikipedia article

2015-10-05T00:26:12Z

link to wikipedia article

Woozle: new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2399&type=con

2015-10-05T00:24:32Z

new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2399&type=con

New page

<hide>
[[category:debate point]]
<let save name=debate-point-summary>There are court decisons which contradict this claim.</let>
<let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let>
<let save name=debate-point-type>con</let>
<let save name=debate-point-details>In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)

There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged...
</let>
<let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" />
</hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <hide>
 [[category:debate point]]
-<let save name=debate-point-summary>There are court decisons which contradict this claim.</let>
+<let save name=debate-point-summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that some types of gun are not protected by the 2nd amendment.</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let>
-<let save name=debate-point-details>In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)
+<let save name=debate-point-details>In {{l/wp|United States v. Miller}} (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)
 There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged...