Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/144226 - Revision history

Woozle: name of article

2016-05-19T21:17:55Z

name of article

Woozle: some details for possible argument

2016-05-19T21:17:09Z

some details for possible argument

Woozle: moving comment to M11

2016-05-19T19:51:28Z

moving comment to M11

Woozle: this is point M12

2016-05-19T18:44:38Z

this is point M12

Woozle: new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2456&type=pro

2016-05-19T18:42:26Z

new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2456&type=pro

New page

<hide>
[[category:debate point]]
<let save name=debate-point-summary>Sanders delegates who had been disqualified were not given the opportunity to show why they were in fact qualified.</let>
<let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/142157</let>
<let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let>
<let save name=debate-point-details>It seems to be agreed that Nevada state officials had disqualified 56 Sanders-supporting delegates, and that they did so because those delegates either had done the paperwork wrong or hadn't registered as Democrats in time.

* '''2016-05-17''' (Vox) [http://www.vox.com/2016/5/17/11680904/bernie-sanders-nevada-convention Bernie Sanders's war with Nevada Democrats, explained]</let>
<let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" />
</hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 <let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-details>This article implies that all but one of the delegates had no prior reason to believe they were not qualified:
-* '''2016-05-18''' [http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/18/the-faux-fracas-in-nevada-how-a-reporters-pack-of-lies-ran-riot-in-the-fact-averse-media/ ] "Fifty-eight Sanders supporters were denied entry to the Nevada Convention and were told they weren’t Democrats. Other than the one guy who acknowledged he switched his registration on his own, this is ludicrous. Nevada had onsite registration for the original caucuses in February, and no one could participate in them unless they were registered as a Democrat." This doesn't seem specific enough for a counterpoint, however.</let>
+* '''2016-05-18''' [http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/18/the-faux-fracas-in-nevada-how-a-reporters-pack-of-lies-ran-riot-in-the-fact-averse-media/ The Faux Fracas in Nevada: How a Reporter Manufactured a Riot] "Fifty-eight Sanders supporters were denied entry to the Nevada Convention and were told they weren’t Democrats. Other than the one guy who acknowledged he switched his registration on his own, this is ludicrous. Nevada had onsite registration for the original caucuses in February, and no one could participate in them unless they were registered as a Democrat." This doesn't seem specific enough for a counterpoint, however.</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" />
 </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/142157</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let>
-<let save name=debate-point-details>It seems to be agreed that Nevada state officials had disqualified 56 Sanders-supporting delegates, and that they did so because those delegates either had done the paperwork wrong or hadn't registered as Democrats in time.
+<let save name=debate-point-details></let>
 <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" />
 </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <hide>
 [[category:debate point]]
-<let save name=debate-point-summary>Sanders delegates who had been disqualified were not given the opportunity to show why they were in fact qualified.</let>
+<let save name=debate-point-summary>(M12) Sanders delegates who had been disqualified were not given the opportunity to show why they were in fact qualified.</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/142157</let>
 <let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let>