User:Woozle/book ideas/101 Things - Revision history

Woozle: small government

2016-03-10T23:43:48Z

small government

Woozle: another starting point

2016-03-10T23:32:29Z

another starting point

Woozle: moved from Reality Agenda; expanded slightly

2016-03-10T22:56:07Z

moved from Reality Agenda; expanded slightly

New page

This is sort of a variation on the {{l/same|Reality Agenda}} idea:

=''101 Things Liberals Can't Believe You Still Don't Understand''=

In general, it would use examples of right-wing idiocy as a starting point for demolishing RW political positions.

* Example: The "gay island, lesbian island, straight island" argument ([http://draconicnoble.tumblr.com/post/140595390848/ace-pergers-syndrome-theelizabethwinters Tumblr], [http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/this-homophobic-tumblr-post-transformed-into-a-dystopian-lgbti-adventure-novel-and-it-is-amazing/#gs.a_7Nuis Gay Star News]) makes the following mistakes:
** Gay people can't reproduce.
*** '''1. Yes, gay people can reproduce.''' It just doesn't happen accidentally.
** People not reproducing is a threat to society.
*** '''2. The population is already too big, so anything we can do to reduce reproduction is a good thing.'''
*** '''3. There is no shortage of breeders.''' Even if humans were threatened with extinction, and even if gay people actually couldn't reproduce, gay people are and will always be a minority. (But note that both of these "if"s are still wrong.)
*** '''4. Being gay is not a choice.''' It is innate. Gay people can choose to ''pretend'' to be straight, but you can't just stop being gay -- no matter how many bad reasons you might have for wanting someone to do so.
** Being gay is not natural.
*** Actually, yes: '''5. homosexuality is found in nature.''' Being gay is natural.
*** '''6. You can't reject something just because it is "unnatural".''' If you're rejecting "unnatural" things, then you need to reject houses, clothing, cars... (If you really want to complain about something "unnatural" that's destroying society, why not start with structured investment vehicles, mortgage-backed securities, gerrymandering, or Fox News?)

Another possible starting point: How the "pro-life" movement works against its claimed goals (see [[cwre:Misnomers/right to life]]).

I'm sure there are numerous others.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Other possible starting points:
 * How the "pro-life" movement works against its claimed goals (see [[cwre:Misnomers/right to life]]).
-* Republicans are actually ''terrible'' at managing other people's money. Democrats may occasionally be corrupt or screw things up, but they generally do much better at promoting general prosperity -- despite what Republicans would have you believe.
+* Republicans are actually ''terrible'' at managing other people's money. Democrats may occasionally be corrupt or screw things up, but they generally do much better at promoting general prosperity -- despite what Republicans would have you believe. Republicans have expanded the debt and deficit far more than Democrats ever have.
 I'm sure there are numerous others.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *** '''6. You can't reject something just because it is "unnatural".''' If you're rejecting "unnatural" things, then you need to reject houses, clothing, cars... (If you really want to complain about something "unnatural" that's destroying society, why not start with structured investment vehicles, mortgage-backed securities, gerrymandering, or Fox News?)
-Another possible starting point: How the "pro-life" movement works against its claimed goals (see [[cwre:Misnomers/right to life]]).
+Other possible starting points:
 I'm sure there are numerous others.