Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/05/065809

<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>It appears that the amendment was written with the expectation that there would be a militia but no standing army, which is very much no longer the case.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/194152</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>The actuality of a large standing army shifts the balance in terms of what weapons, if any, a militia should have. For one thing, it means we can distinguish between military weapons and those suitable for civilian use.</let> <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />