Difference between revisions of "Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/202432"

From ICMS
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2399&type=con)
 
(rephrase (unexpectedly difficult point to make succinctly))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
 
[[category:debate point]]
 
[[category:debate point]]
<let save name=debate-point-summary>There are court decisons which contradict this claim.</let>
+
<let save name=debate-point-summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that some types of gun are not protected by the 2nd amendment.</let>
 
<let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let>
 
<let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let>
 
<let save name=debate-point-type>con</let>
 
<let save name=debate-point-type>con</let>
<let save name=debate-point-details>In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)
+
<let save name=debate-point-details>In {{l/wp|United States v. Miller}} (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)
  
 
There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged...
 
There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged...

Latest revision as of 00:31, 5 October 2015

<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that some types of gun are not protected by the 2nd amendment.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, the court found that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)

There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged... </let> <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />