Difference between revisions of "Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/144226"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2456&type=pro) |
m (name of article) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
[[category:debate point]] | [[category:debate point]] | ||
| − | <let save name=debate-point-summary>Sanders delegates who had been disqualified were not given the opportunity to show why they were in fact qualified.</let> | + | <let save name=debate-point-summary>(M12) Sanders delegates who had been disqualified were not given the opportunity to show why they were in fact qualified.</let> |
<let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/142157</let> | <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/142157</let> | ||
<let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let> | <let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let> | ||
| − | <let save name=debate-point-details> | + | <let save name=debate-point-details>This article implies that all but one of the delegates had no prior reason to believe they were not qualified: |
| − | + | * '''2016-05-18''' [http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/18/the-faux-fracas-in-nevada-how-a-reporters-pack-of-lies-ran-riot-in-the-fact-averse-media/ The Faux Fracas in Nevada: How a Reporter Manufactured a Riot] "Fifty-eight Sanders supporters were denied entry to the Nevada Convention and were told they weren’t Democrats. Other than the one guy who acknowledged he switched his registration on his own, this is ludicrous. Nevada had onsite registration for the original caucuses in February, and no one could participate in them unless they were registered as a Democrat." This doesn't seem specific enough for a counterpoint, however.</let> | |
| − | * '''2016-05- | ||
<let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> | <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> | ||
</hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData /> | </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData /> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:17, 19 May 2016
<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>(M12) Sanders delegates who had been disqualified were not given the opportunity to show why they were in fact qualified.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2016/05/19/142157</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>This article implies that all but one of the delegates had no prior reason to believe they were not qualified:
- 2016-05-18 The Faux Fracas in Nevada: How a Reporter Manufactured a Riot "Fifty-eight Sanders supporters were denied entry to the Nevada Convention and were told they weren’t Democrats. Other than the one guy who acknowledged he switched his registration on his own, this is ludicrous. Nevada had onsite registration for the original caucuses in February, and no one could participate in them unless they were registered as a Democrat." This doesn't seem specific enough for a counterpoint, however.</let>
<let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />