Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/211727

From ICMS
< Exhibits‎ | debate
Revision as of 01:17, 5 October 2015 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2417&type=con)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>We already do this to a very large extent; adopting this principle would require much greater legal and social upheaval than would merely updating the 2nd amentment.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/211428</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>This seems like a bit of an attempt to sympathy-troll the liberals, who frequently say that medical insurance (and education, and incarceration, and possibly other things) shouldn't be outsourced to private for-profit companies. The analogy doesn't hold, as far as I can see; private insurance is a valuable regulatory tool when used properly.</let> <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />