Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809

From ICMS
< Exhibits‎ | debate
Revision as of 00:18, 5 October 2015 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (formatting)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>As an example: restrictions on fully automatic weapons are unconstitutional.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/195248</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>pro</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>

Josh Hendrix, 9:13 AM: +Martin Espinoza , does that mean the restrictions on fully automatic weapons is unconstitutional?
Martin Espinoza, 9:19 AM: +Josh Hendrix Yes, it clearly does. The whole premise of the 2A is that it is PART of a set of rules to make a better nation.</let>

<let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />