Difference between revisions of "Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/202432"
(new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2399&type=con) |
(rephrase (unexpectedly difficult point to make succinctly)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
[[category:debate point]] | [[category:debate point]] | ||
| − | <let save name=debate-point-summary> | + | <let save name=debate-point-summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that some types of gun are not protected by the 2nd amendment.</let> |
<let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let> | <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let> | ||
<let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> | <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> | ||
| − | <let save name=debate-point-details>In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.) | + | <let save name=debate-point-details>In {{l/wp|United States v. Miller}} (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, [https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 the court found] that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.) |
There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged... | There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged... | ||
Latest revision as of 00:31, 5 October 2015
<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that some types of gun are not protected by the 2nd amendment.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/201809</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". (In this specific case, the court found that restricting ownership of "shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long" did not violate the 2nd amendment.)
There may be other significant cases, but I'll hold off researching them until this is challenged... </let> <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />