Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/203736

From ICMS
< Exhibits‎ | debate
Revision as of 00:43, 5 October 2015 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (oops, this is a con-point)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>The reason for this ruling was that the gun in question had no "reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia", but clearly an automatic rifle would be very useful in armed combat, therefore does have such a relationship, therefore is protected.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/202432</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> <let save name=debate-point-details></let> <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="on" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />