Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/05/065058

From ICMS
< Exhibits‎ | debate
Revision as of 10:50, 5 October 2015 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (new page from form at http://iseeamess.com/wiki/index.php?title=ICMS:Laboratory/debate/forms/response&id=2389&type=con)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<hide> <let save name=debate-point-summary>Even if it means "working properly", this includes having guns only in the hands of those who can be trusted to use them safely.</let> <let save name=debate-point-parent>Exhibits/debate/points/Woozle/2015/10/04/193410</let> <let save name=debate-point-type>con</let> <let save name=debate-point-details>There is no contradiction be a "well-regulated" militia and one that forbids criminals or crazy people, or requires a gun safe or lock, or keeps weapons in central armories instead of homes.

In other words: even the steelman interpretation of of "well-regulated" does not mean unregulated.

(from Steve S. here.)</let> <let save name=debate-point-req-all val="" /> </hide><exec mod=debate-mw func=ShowDebateData />